They’ve also had their share of court cases, which have defined rules and set guidelines for future cases. When trying to determine if downloading music from an online source is ethical, one must look at various court cases throughout the years to understand the history of the issue. The following court cases could help one make such a decision. A Records vs.. Anapest (2001) Their activities were ruled to be inductive to financial gain from illegal infringement. (Laws. Com) MGM Studios, Inc. . Grosser, Ltd. (2005) Providers of Software that’s designed to enable “file sharing” of copyrighted works may be held liable for the infringement that takes place using that software. (Copyright. Gob) Arises Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC (2006) By distributing and maintaining Limier (they) intentionally induced direct infringement by users. (Gavin) Victim Vs.. Google (2007) Youth was not liable for infringement because it removed unauthorized videos when informed about them.
Jeffrey) The consensus of previous court hearings seems to be that free music downloads are unethical because the artists are not being paid for their work. This however, has not deterred other websites from offering free music downloads. “Tensions have eased substantially, as Youth has set up an automated system to detect and block infringing videos and has signed revenue-sharing agreements with more than a thousand media companies. ” I believe that original websites like Anapest, who didn’t pay royalties to copyright owners, were unethical.